Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>]

And to start off the comments, I wanted tell my personal opinion about this.

First, I have not been extremely happy with either the h&b or the 
3932bis document, as some people who have been reading the various lists 
may gather. However, I think they were already good enough to be shipped 
before the changes to 3932bis. (And indeed, h&b has been shipped by the 
IAB.) And I can't get that excited about debates regarding the role of 
the various boilerplate texts, because I suspect that the only people 
reading them are the ones who are going to respond to this thread :-)

I do think though that additional information at the level of "This RFC 
describes FOO. A standardized version of FOO can be found from RFC 
NNNN." is useful. I think -07 version of the 3932bis is an improvement 
over the previous one, and should be approved.

Jari