![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Rosen <erosen at cisco.com> writes:
Eric> If we are going to talk about adding new hoops for folks to
Eric> jump through, we should first discuss whether any such hoops
Eric> are necessary. We should not start the discussion by
Eric> looking at the details of the particular proposed hoops.
Agreed. I think that if we don't have agreement with the
goals/high-level of this type of proposal, it's completely reasonable
to block review of details until that reaches agreement.
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.