Re: [IAB] I-D ACTION:draft-iab-mpls-tp-uncoord-harmful-00.txt

[Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com>]

Dave:

Can you offer a paragraph or so of text to go with the list of 
documents?  Are there any lessons learned or principles that need to 
be added to the list based on the this experience?

Russ


At 02:59 PM 6/10/2009, Dave CROCKER wrote:


> Internet-Drafts at ietf.org wrote:
> >          In particular, this was
> >    achieved via the establishment of the "Joint working team on MPLS-TP"
> >    which was the first ever joint ITU/IETF group.
>
>
> How quickly we forget:
>
>   ITU's T.37 and IETF's:
>
>    RFC4142 - Full-mode Fax Profile for Internet Mail (FFPIM)
>    RFC3950 - Tag Image File Format Fax eXtended (TIFF-FX) -
>              image/tiff-fx MIME Sub-type Registration
>    RFC3949 - File Format for Internet Fax
>    RFC3192 - Minimal FAX address format in Internet Mail
>    RFC3249 - Implementers Guide for Facsimile Using Internet Mail
>    RFC3192 - Minimal FAX address format in Internet Mail
>    RFC2880 - Internet Fax T.30 Feature Mapping
>    RFC2879 - Content Feature Schema for Internet Fax (V2)
>    RFC2542 - Terminology and Goals for Internet Fax
>    RFC2534 - Media Features for Display, Print, and Fax
>    RFC2532 - Extended Facsimile Using Internet Mail
>    RFC2531 - Content Feature Schema for Internet Fax
>    RFC2304 - Minimal FAX address format in Internet Mail
>    RFC2301 - File Format for Internet Fax
>
> were the result of an 8-year closely cooperative relationship 
> between the two groups.
>
> But it had an extremely rocky start that required careful 
> negotiation to resolve.
>
> d.
>
> --
>
>   Dave Crocker
>   Brandenburg InternetWorking
>   bbiw.net