![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
for Ogg / Vorbis. He was also one of my sources from before. Regards Marshall Begin forwarded message:
From: Christopher Montgomery <xiphmont at gmail.com> Date: June 23, 2009 2:32:07 PM EDT To: Marshall Eubanks <tme at americafree.tv> Subject: Re: IETF Trust TLPOn Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Marshall Eubanks<tme at americafree.tv> wrote:I would be curious as to your perspective on the "license by reference"issue as instantiated and the entire TLP support of open source.First, I Am Not A Lawyer, and since the legal implications are probably the most important, I'm not going to be able to comment on the most important aspect. As a creator, I am personally interested in license clarity. So long as it's absolutely clear what the license is, a code component or document clearly referencing the correct license is more than sufficient for me. In the simplest sense (the code simply saying, "BSD license, see file") was one of the great 'improvements' at the time over the MIT license, which required the license be part of the code. You ended up with many files consisting mostly of pages upon pages of various licenses and copyrights rather than code itself. Coding is a massively collaborative exercise, and the licensing and attribution have to scale. Or am I missing completely what you're asking?
No, that was it.
Monty
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.