Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam at gmail.com>
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:38:55 +0200
In-reply-to: <a123a5d60906281045g59b4390g580e34262d6fdbcf at mail.gmail.com>
References: <A1B02F91-FD0F-4232-A57F-329BB5603B9C at muada.com> <a123a5d60906281045g59b4390g580e34262d6fdbcf at mail.gmail.com>

Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

I remain heartily fed up that the HTML versions of documents that I
know were submitted with XML source are not available, nor is the XML
source.

The TXT versions do not print on my printer and have not printed
reliably on any printer I have ever owned.

just an aside:

the way I've found that works reliably these days for printing I-Ds andRFCs is to load them into OpenOffice's editor (oowriter) and use "print"from there.


Somehow, OpenOffice managed to understand the formfeed character.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum

References:
- More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker

Prev by Date: RE: More liberal draft formatting standards required
Next by Date: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
Previous by thread: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
Next by thread: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.