Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required

From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore at gmail.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam at gmail.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:16:37 -0400
In-reply-to: <DE3D159E-D263-4F0D-949F-A17E3B31B030 at muada.com>
References: <A1B02F91-FD0F-4232-A57F-329BB5603B9C at muada.com> <a123a5d60906281045g59b4390g580e34262d6fdbcf at mail.gmail.com> <4A49EB3F.6030706 at alvestrand.no> <DE3D159E-D263-4F0D-949F-A17E3B31B030 at muada.com>

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

On the Mac you can still use lpr <file> but unfortunately the formfeedsget lost when you do that.


I use enscript.

Melinda

References:
- More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Harald Alvestrand
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum

Prev by Date: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
Next by Date: OPS-DIR review of draft-ietf-speermint-requirements
Previous by thread: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
Next by thread: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.