Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required



Tim Bray wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum<iljitsch at muada.com> wrote:

A much better solution would be HTML, if it's sufficiently constrained. HTML
allows for the reflowing of text, solving issues with text and screen sizes.
It's also extremely widely implemented, so it's easy to display reasonably
well without special tools. It also allows for semantic tagging, allowing
for easy scraping.

This seems obviously true everywhere outside the IETF mailing list.
The showstopper has always been with figures which need to do in separate files.
How do you  manipulate the collection of files as a single object?

At least with pdf you know you have the whole thing.

Stewart

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.