Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>]

On 2 jul 2009, at 17:05, Stewart Bryant wrote:

A much better solution would be HTML

This seems obviously true everywhere outside the IETF mailing list.

The showstopper has always been with figures which need to do in separate  files. How do you  manipulate the collection of files as a single object?

Multiple files seems problematic.

However, we can stick with ASCII art even if we adopt HTML.

   ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┯━━━━━━━━━━━┓

   ┃ An influx of a (hopefully limited) set │ of unicode symbols┃

   ┃ could allow for more expressiveness in │ this area.        ┃

   ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┷━━━━━━━━━━━┛