Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required



Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
  On 2 jul 2009, at 17:05, Stewart Bryant wrote:

A much better solution would be HTML

This seems obviously true everywhere outside the IETF mailing list.

The showstopper has always been with figures which need to do in separate files. How do you manipulate the collection of files as a single object?

Multiple files seems problematic.

However, we can stick with ASCII art even if we adopt HTML.
...

Indeed. Let's keep these discussions separate.

BR, Julian

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.