Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required



On 3 jul 2009, at 13:13, Stewart Bryant wrote:

That is an author centric view. It is far more important to take a reader centric view.

Do we have any objective information on what format produced the clearest information transfer in the reader.

Well, readers can't read what authors can't produce.

Perhaps a good image trumps good text, but I don't think we can assume that this is the choice we'll be faced with in general, mediocre image vs good text or bad image vs mediocre text seems more likely.

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.