Re: Releasing xml2rfc 1.34pre3?

+1!!

Carsten Bormann wrote:
> 1.34pre3 is certainly working for people doing drafts these days.
> 1.33, however, is utterly useless!
> 
> Ship it.

References:
- RE: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Yaakov Stein
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Theodore Tso
- RE: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Tony Hain
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Douglas Otis
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Ted Hardie
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Marshall Eubanks
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Stewart Bryant
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Marshall Eubanks
- Two different threads (was: More liberal draft formatting standards required)
  - From: Andrew Sullivan
- Releasing xml2rfc 1.34pre3?
  - From: Carsten Bormann
- Re: Releasing xml2rfc 1.34pre3?
  - From: Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Releasing xml2rfc 1.34pre3?
  - From: Carsten Bormann

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.