Re: [xml2rfc] Releasing xml2rfc 1.34pre3?

Marshall Rose wrote:

julian, bill - i thought we were waiting on another revision forboilerplate changes? is that imminent?


Some changes are upcoming.

One was made by the RFC Editor on July, 1st (moving abstract in front ofthe boiler plate).

There was also disagreement on where to move the new 5378 escape clause;I'd need to review this mailing list's archives for details.


BR, Julian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml2rfc] Releasing xml2rfc 1.34pre3?
  - From: Lars Eggert

References:
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- RE: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Yaakov Stein
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Theodore Tso
- RE: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Tony Hain
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Douglas Otis
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Ted Hardie
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Marshall Eubanks
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Stewart Bryant
- Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required
  - From: Marshall Eubanks
- Two different threads (was: More liberal draft formatting standards required)
  - From: Andrew Sullivan
- Releasing xml2rfc 1.34pre3?
  - From: Carsten Bormann
- Re: Releasing xml2rfc 1.34pre3?
  - From: Lars Eggert

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.