Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Lars Eggert<lars.eggert at nokia.com> wrote:
> since you asked: I have absolutely no problems with xml2rfc.
>
> I used to edit in nroff, which wasn't compatible with my brain, and I used
> Joe's Word template, which works OK, but I prefer something ASCII-based for
> collaborative editing (for svn, diff, etc.)
>
> I'm fully open to trying something new once someone creates a different
> ("better") tool, but until then, xml2rfc is OK.
What Lars said. -T
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
