Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)

From: sob at harvard.edu (Scott O. Bradner)
To: henk at ripe.net, sob at harvard.edu
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:32:24 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <4A642699.4040300 at ripe.net>

> Aren't RFC 5377/5378 (and subsequent discussion) such a statement?

did I miss the posting that lists each of the proposed chages
with a pointer to the specific request for change (or specific
need for change) in these RFCs?

Scott

References:
- Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
  - From: Henk Uijterwaal

Prev by Date: Re: [rfc-i] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale for Proposed TLP Revisions)
Next by Date: Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
Previous by thread: Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
Next by thread: Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.