Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)

From: Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob at harvard.edu>
Cc: henk at ripe.net, ietf at ietf.org
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:01:04 +0200
In-reply-to: <20090719112919.BCF4C1AABBDC at newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
References: <20090719112919.BCF4C1AABBDC at newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>

On 7/19/09 1:29 PM, Scott O. Bradner wrote:

Isn't this what has essentially happened in this case?

I did not see a statement from the IETF asking for changes
nor did I see a statement from the Trust saying that there
are these issues that need to be fixed for legal or cosmetic
reasons

This would have helped me as well. Supposedly the changes would helpone of my WG authors but I don't see how. So I've had to refer thematter to my corporate legal people who have not gotten back to me, andso I have a draft stall.


Eliot

References:
- Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
  - From: Scott O. Bradner

Prev by Date: Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
Next by Date: Re: Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions(TLP)
Previous by thread: Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
Next by thread: Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions(TLP)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.