Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)

From: Fred Baker <fred at cisco.com>
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob at harvard.edu>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:09:31 -0700
In-reply-to: <20090719011815.13A371AA7D2E at newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
References: <20090719011815.13A371AA7D2E at newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>

On Jul 18, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Scott O. Bradner wrote:

2nd way:
The IETF Trust determines that there is a specific legal risk thatmust
be countered.  In this case the IETF Trust posts a description of the
specific risk and the proposed change to counter the risk. In thiscase
the Trust publishes the proposed changes with a 4-week last call and
adopts the changes if the IETF Chair determines that there is not IETF
consensus against the specific changes.


What do you think the Trust is doing in this case?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
  - From: Pete Resnick

References:
- Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
  - From: Scott O. Bradner

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-requirements (MPLS-TP Requirements)toProposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: [rfc-i] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale for Proposed TLP Revisions)
Previous by thread: Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions(TLP)
Next by thread: Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.