Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale forProposed TLP Revisions)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale forProposed TLP Revisions)

From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists at gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh at joelhalpern.com>
Cc: trustees at ietf.org, wgchairs at ietf.org, "Contreras, Jorge" <Jorge.Contreras at wilmerhale.com>, ietf at ietf.org, rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org, iab at iab.org, iesg at ietf.org
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:20:18 -0400
In-reply-to: <4A64D95C.5020009 at joelhalpern.com>
References: <4A64249E.6010805 at alvestrand.no> <20090720124126.096A99A4721 at odin.smetech.net> <50E312B117033946BA23AA102C8134C6037E22EE at SDCPEXCCL2MX.wilmerhale.com> <20090720183204.GA2377 at shinkuro.com> <4A64BDC1.8010707 at joelhalpern.com> <20090720192524.GB2377 at shinkuro.com> <50E312B117033946BA23AA102C8134C6037E22F8 at SDCPEXCCL2MX.wilmerhale.com> <4A64D95C.5020009 at joelhalpern.com>

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Joel M. Halpern<jmh at joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> I think Harald's suggestion makes sense and should be implemented.

I agree.

Barry

References:
- Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale for Proposed TLP Revisions)
  - From: Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale for Proposed TLP Revisions)
  - From: Russ Housley
- RE: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale for Proposed TLP Revisions)
  - From: Contreras, Jorge
- Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale for Proposed TLP Revisions)
  - From: Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale for Proposed TLP Revisions)
  - From: Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale for Proposed TLP Revisions)
  - From: Andrew Sullivan
- RE: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale forProposed TLP Revisions)
  - From: Contreras, Jorge
- Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale forProposed TLP Revisions)
  - From: Joel M. Halpern

Prev by Date: Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale forProposed TLP Revisions)
Next by Date: Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-extractor (Keying Material Exporters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale forProposed TLP Revisions)
Next by thread: Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale forProposed TLP Revisions)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale forProposed TLP Revisions)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.