![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On 27 jul 2009, at 9:43, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
This must mean that silently enabling IPv6 increases the number of people for whom IPv6 works by a factor of around 100 (from <0.01% in the general population
(http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/08/the-end-is-near-but-is-ipv6/ said <0.01%.)
The 0.01% they talk about is TRAFFIC, not USERS. And it's bogus anyway. For instance, just the traffic through the AMS-IX is many times more than what they measured:
http://www.ams-ix.net/technical/stats/sflow/ (Note that they use meaningless lying graphs = don't start at 0.)At AMS-IX, native IPv6 traffic is now 0.3% on average, up from 0.1% a year or so ago. When I did some web bug measurements years ago my results where about 0.16% IPv6 users (1 in 666). Last year, Google got 0.25%.
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.