[Fwd: [ntpwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt (Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6) to Proposed Standard]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: [ntpwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt (Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6) to Proposed Standard]



The NTP protocol is inappropriately ONLY adding functionality for other protocols which are already hosted by the entity hosting the NTPWG work and as such this is a HUGE conflict of interest without adding NTP to NEA and other protocols.

Todd Glassey

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [ntpwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt (Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6) to Proposed Standard
Date: 	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: 	The IESG <iesg-secretary at ietf.org>
Reply-To: 	ietf at ietf.org
To: 	IETF-Announce <ietf-announce at ietf.org>
CC: 	ntpwg at lists.ntp.isc.org



The IESG has received a request from the Network Time Protocol WG (ntp) to consider the following document:

- 'Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6 '
  <draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt-04.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-08-17. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg at ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt-04.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=17276&rfc_flag=0

_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg at lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.42/2278 - Release Date: 08/02/09 17:56:00


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.