Re: Obnoxious license

From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org>
To: Fred Baker <fred at cisco.com>, SM <sm at resistor.net>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:34:06 -0700
In-reply-to: <E859E33E-9BED-4ABE-AEA4-31415772E781 at cisco.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20090813134034.0331e008 at elandnews.com> <E859E33E-9BED-4ABE-AEA4-31415772E781 at cisco.com>

At 2:12 PM -0700 8/13/09, Fred Baker wrote:
>That's essentially why we are trying to enable folks to put a reference in. The license needs to be with the extracted code. Can you suggest a way to put the license at the end (where I would but happier to have it also) and have it wind up in the extracted code?

Instead of putting it "at the end", it could be put on a web site on a URL that is epected to be long-lived. "http://www.rfc-editor.org/licenses/rfc6789-figure-1-license.txt"; comes to mind.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Obnoxious license
  - From: Andrew Sullivan

References:
- Obnoxious license
  - From: SM
- Re: Obnoxious license
  - From: Fred Baker

Prev by Date: Re: Obnoxious license
Next by Date: Re: Obnoxious license
Previous by thread: Re: Obnoxious license
Next by thread: Re: Obnoxious license
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Obnoxious license

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.