Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh at joelhalpern.com>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>, IESG <iesg at ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:20:09 +0100
In-reply-to: <4A9BF4D6.2080201 at joelhalpern.com>
References: <20090601135553.76CC73A6DB6 at core3.amsl.com> <4A23EA07.8030709 at piuha.net> <4A23EC17.1010303 at piuha.net> <DC08019F-8EAC-40FF-BCE9-66AA0F473DFB at NLnetLabs.nl> <86C717D4-1B08-4155-8B98-FF11EC80501E at cisco.com> <20090827155712.F1FE89A4738 at odin.smetech.net><4A973005.3070506 at gmail.com> <4A973D42.8030203 at dcrocker.net> <23D63F9D-731B-45C8-9A87-735A669DE88B at NLnetLabs.nl> <0EE9958DE3644CD5A1447BF1CE381BCE at your029b8cecfe> <4A97F36F.5080809 at dcrocker.net> <4A9BD036.1000206 at piuha.net> <4A9BF4D6.2080201 at joelhalpern.com>

Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> Thus, I strongly prefer (a).   I prefer that such notes be rare, and
> that they remain recommendations to the ISE.

+1 to that,

S.

References:
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
  - From: Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
  - From: Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
  - From: Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
  - From: Dave CROCKER
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
  - From: Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures forHandling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
  - From: Adrian Farrel
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures forHandling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
  - From: Dave CROCKER
- draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes
  - From: Joel M. Halpern

Prev by Date: Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes
Next by Date: Re: Important Information about IETF 76 Meeting Registration
Previous by thread: Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes
Next by thread: Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.