Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

[Adam Roach <adam at nostrum.com>]

Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> And given that these are Independent Submissions, they aren't supposed 
> to be subject to community review.

Given this fact, why is there pushback on the idea that we would 
prominently mark the documents to indicate that they have not been 
subjected to community review? It seems like the kind of thing that is 
of extreme relevance to the reader.

/a