Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

[Adam Roach <adam at nostrum.com>]

Jari Arkko wrote:
> However, in this case: if you have a general comment on 3932bis, 
> please post to the Last Call thread. If you want to answer my specific 
> question about the optional/mandatory nature of the IESG note, please 
> respond to this thread.

So, to be clear, the question you have raised has to do with the 
difference between:

   "The IESG may choose to add an IESG note to an Independent
   Submission..."


and:

   "The IESG may choose to request the addition of an IESG note to an
   Independent Submission..."



Right? This has nothing to do with the text:

   "In exceptional cases, when the relationship of the document to the
   IETF standards process might be unclear..." ?



/a