Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes



Robert,

the IESG should not be making any kind of technical review of
independent submissions

Right, and we are not.

 - the reason the review was even permitted ... was to allow work that was submitted independently
but which was directly in the same area as IETF work to be merged, and
all considered together.

That is indeed the primary goal of the 3932 and 3932bis. I.e., promote independent work, but allow a check in the exceptional case that it collides with IETF work.

Jari


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.