Re: IPv6 standard?

[Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no>]

Eliot Lear writes:
> Historic is appropriate when we want to make a statement about the 
> appropriateness of the technology. However, we probably enter a huge 
> bureaucratic entanglement of what happens to all of the docs that 
> normatively reference 791, 792, and 793. And that's another question, 
> what precisely DO we make Historic?

In five years, someone who shows up in a WG saying that so-and-so 
doesn't work with NAT will be met with relieved smiles, and someone 
will say "that's history" ;)

Arnt