Re: China venue survey

From: Melinda Shore <shore at arsc.edu>
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole at cisco.com>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy at cisco.com>, "ietf at ietf.org" <ietf at ietf.org>, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf at checkpoint.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:56:20 -0800
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0909221043320.20147 at pita.cisco.com>
References: <mailman.3221.1253327041.4737.ietf at ietf.org> <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80190AD328350 at il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0909190545070.7372 at pita.cisco.com> <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80190AD328358 at il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com> <57FA5E0B-C179-412F-8CD6-5DE489BD6E70 at cisco.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0909221043320.20147 at pita.cisco.com>

On Sep 22, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:

Well, nobody has officially announced that the proposed venue is
Beijing,


Or Vancouver either, right?  I assumed that Cullen
threw the city names out as straw proposals and that
the broader question is still valid - IETF 79 is only
a year off.

Melinda

Follow-Ups:
- Re: China venue survey
  - From: Ole Jacobsen

References:
- Re: China venue survey
  - From: Yaron Sheffer
- Re: China venue survey
  - From: Ole Jacobsen
- RE: China venue survey
  - From: Yaron Sheffer
- Re: China venue survey
  - From: Cullen Jennings
- Re: China venue survey
  - From: Ole Jacobsen

Prev by Date: Re: China venue survey
Next by Date: Re: China venue survey
Previous by thread: Re: China venue survey
Next by thread: Re: China venue survey
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: China venue survey

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.