Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF

From: Adam Roach <adam at nostrum.com>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs at bgp.nu>
Cc: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs at ietf.org>, IETF-Discussion list <ietf at ietf.org>, IAOC Jabberr <iaoc at ietf.org>, "irtf-chair at irtf.org" <irtf-chair at irtf.org>, IETF Announcement list <ietf-announce at ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:13:49 -0500
In-reply-to: <32445511-5AF5-4006-96C6-7662E2DA8872 at bgp.nu>
References: <4568491E-A8CA-4089-84C7-2D555F929204 at americafree.tv> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB177049A09F95D53 at EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <32445511-5AF5-4006-96C6-7662E2DA8872 at bgp.nu>

On 9/18/09 14:33, Sep 18, John G. Scudder wrote:

[T]here would also seem to be a risk of loss of productivity due toself-censorship by people who do choose to attend.


+1

/a

References:
- Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  - From: Marshall Eubanks
- RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  - From: Ross Callon
- Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
  - From: John G. Scudder

Prev by Date: Re: China venue survey
Next by Date: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
Previous by thread: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
Next by thread: RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.