![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hi, Just for clarification, does this draft require using a PID for BFD and LSP-ping? If not how are the various OAM types identified? Thanks, Shahram -----Original Message----- From: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of The IESG Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 3:54 PM To: IETF-Announce Cc: mpls at ietf.org Subject: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req (MPLS TP Network Management Requirements) to Proposed Standard The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG (mpls) to consider the following document: - 'MPLS TP Network Management Requirements ' <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req-05.txt> as a Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-10-05. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg at ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. The file can be obtained via http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req-05.txt IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=18244&rfc_flag=0 _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.