![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Sep 22, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I'm not talking about incitement to riot, advocacy of terrorism, expressions of racial hatred, or anything of the kind. As I haveexpressed several times in this thread, I'm talking about discussion oftechnical topics that impinge on the political realm: things like the use of encryption to protect personal privacy (especially from the prying eyes of Isaac and Justin), the Internet as a technology that routes around censorship as damage, and the simple human right to be*left alone* by government bureaucrats and other such busybodies if oneis going about one's business in a peaceful manner.
Concrete example:Would a presentation on how tor was used to bypass state controls on news during the recent election protests in Iran be acceptable under the terms of the agreement?
That would sound like a perfectly appropriate and timely plenary presentation. And it seems to me to violate the plain language of the agreement concerning "human rights".
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.