![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote: > Being some kind of IPv6 > "evangelist", I'll admit it, I do need to gain a feeling of points of > view from people who are in the know, and the range of replies in this > short thread has been interesting indeed. Given that IPv4 address space can be extended with port numbers still preserving the end to end transparency, why do you insist on IPv6? > With such problems being encountered with dual stack, would it make > sense to deprecating IPv4 standards ASAP in order to shorten the time > for use of dual stack and this shorten the likelyhood of consumers being > turned off IPv6? Not at all. Instead, deprecating IPv6 makes sense. Masataka Ohta
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.