Re: One level up on the IAOC decision in re: China.
Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Thu, 24 September 2009 20:37 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B493A6809 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wbUi4Jk03TyI for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D393A68D9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (ppp-68-120-198-98.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.120.198.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8OKcm7r031971 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:38:53 -0700
Message-ID: <4ABBD8CF.4090902@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:38:39 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "HUANG, ZHIHUI (JERRY), ATTLABS" <jhuang1@att.com>
Subject: Re: One level up on the IAOC decision in re: China.
References: <6e04e83a0909241058o77f7ea84w37f9eed473396190@mail.gmail.com> <20090924182536.GA23137@boreas.isi.edu> <sx6JOWu03NAbzz4t9vROdQ.md5@lochnagar.gulbrandsen.priv.no><4ABBC842.4060702@stpeter.im> <4ABBC967.9070806@dcrocker.net> <2FFFD6E98F51BE43878BFED80215F83804280ACF@misout7msgusr7a.ugd.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <2FFFD6E98F51BE43878BFED80215F83804280ACF@misout7msgusr7a.ugd.att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:37:48 -0000
HUANG, ZHIHUI (JERRY), ATTLABS wrote: > Notwithstanding the letter (or the intent) of the quoted contract language, > many people here have pointed out that all sides (IETF, Chinese government, > the Hotel, and participants in China/Asia) want to have a successful IETF > meeting in China - if we are having a meeting in China. IMO It's going to > take a lot of agitation to get the locals riled up to upset/break up the > meeting. Jerry, Alas, the letter is, in fact, standing and present. It says what it says, and it is unique in our history. It cannot be ignored. Also alas, nothwithstanding your excellent intentions, I suspect that you cannot speak for the government or the hotel, and we cannot know what behaviors will cause what damaging impact, nor can you reassure us about the limits that we must stay within. The issue is not one of strictly technical topics, but the ability of our community to navigate within those unknown limits. We /can/ know that as a community, the IETF is often socially inept and even offensive. Some of us are proud of that. Others of us are chagrined. But our behavior has been quite consistent over two decades and there is no sign if its changing. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- One level up on the IAOC decision in re: China. Ted Hardie
- Re: One level up on the IAOC decision in re: Chin… Dave CROCKER
- Re: One level up on the IAOC decision in re: Chin… Bill Manning
- Re: One level up on the IAOC decision in re: Chin… Ted Hardie
- Re: One level up on the IAOC decision in re: Chin… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: One level up on the IAOC decision in re: Chin… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: One level up on the IAOC decision in re: Chin… Dave CROCKER
- RE: One level up on the IAOC decision in re: Chin… HUANG, ZHIHUI (JERRY), ATTLABS
- Re: One level up on the IAOC decision in re: Chin… Dave CROCKER
- Re: One level up on the IAOC decision in re: Chin… James M. Polk
- RE: One level up on the IAOC decision in re: Chin… Glen Zorn
- Re: One level up on the IAOC decision in re: Chin… Marshall Eubanks