Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync URI Scheme) to Informational RFC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync URI Scheme) to Informational RFC



Ted:

Just out of curiousity, why is this registering it as provisional,
rather than permanent scheme?

There is not a rsync protocol specification and URI scheme. The protocol is widely deployed. In fact the IETF depends on it everyday. This document is intended to provide a citable specification for the URL scheme, but not the protocol. Without the protocol specification, provisional seemed like the best choice based on RFC 4395.

Russ

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.