Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync URI Scheme) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync URI Scheme) to Informational RFC

From: Samuel Weiler <weiler at tislabs.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:08:01 -0400 (EDT)

I think the point is that the IESG should probably refer the doc tothe uri-review team to look for any red flags. Mistakes in URIspecs are common (speaking has one that has made some).

The editors asked the uri-review list for feedback in July of thisyear, as required by RFC 4395.


-- Sam

Prev by Date: Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
Next by Date: Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org
Previous by thread: Update on IETF 76 ANA Hotel Availability
Next by thread: Re: Local Beijing people response - RE: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync URI Scheme) to Informational RFC

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.