Re: The IETF and the SmartGrid
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The IETF and the SmartGrid



On 2009-10-06 10:20, Richard Shockey wrote:
...
> The Utility Industry does not understand the current IPv4 number exhaust
> problem and the consequences of that if they want to put a IP address on
> every Utility Meter in North America. 

Ironic, really, since IP addresses for every streetlight was one of
the favourite examples in the IPng days.

Let me quote from RFC 1673 "Electric Power Research Institute Comments on IPng",
authored by
   Ron Skelton
   Member of Technical Staff
   Advanced IT Group
   Electric Power Research Institute
   Palo Alto CA 94303

 "2. Basic Requirements.

      - Scaleability
        The addressing scheme must have essentially an unlimited address
        space to encompass an arbitrarily large number of information
        objects.  Specifically it must solve the fundamental limitations
        of 32 bit formats, a format for 20 octets and above is considered
        suitable."

(The document was biased towards OSI addressing.)

  Brian


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.