NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy

[Sabahattin Gucukoglu <mail at sabahattin-gucukoglu.com>]

Not in the IPv6 address space, anyway.  And if it is, there's  
something wrong and we should put it right.

Just been reading IAB's commentary on IPv6 NAT.  It seems to me that  
we are perpetuating the worst technology in existence *simply* for one  
feature, network mobility, that is better served by proposing new  
techniques and technologies and, in particular: we need a simple way  
to express host relationships inside an organisation that is  
independent of external homing.  I refuse to suffer because of NAT any  
longer and don't want to accommodate those that prefer it.  If IPv6  
does ever get wide enough deployment, and I truly hope it does, I  
might just *give up* things to accommodate the trouble-free life that  
is no NAT.

What do we have right now, first?

Cheers,
Sabahattin