Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy

From: jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
To: ietf at ietf.org
Cc: jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:42:29 -0400 (EDT)

    > From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu <mail at sabahattin-gucukoglu.com>

    > in particular: we need a simple way to express host relationships
    > inside an organisation that is independent of external homing.  

Well, it would really help if we had more namespaces available to name
things in. Oh, wait...

	Noel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
  - From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu

Prev by Date: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
Next by Date: Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
Previous by thread: Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
Next by thread: Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.