![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I agree that the I* should listen to the community, but then the community should regulate itself. Maybe we need a new tradition - something like a polite hum when someone has been ranting for long enough, and a loud humwhen they have been ranting for too long?
I can think of a few people who I think have been ranting too long as soon as they step up to the mike. So, I think it's probably a mistake to turn plenaries into a techie version of "The Gong Show" - we shouldn't be making it easier to silence people with unpopular or annoying views. At least putting a time limit on speeches at the mike is basically (but not perfectly) non-discriminatory. Melinda
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.