![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
But perhaps there's another approach that won't be quite so, well, base. To me, if someone wants more than 2 minutes to make a point, perhaps that person should request a short agenda slot. Here's a little process experiment: why not slot 20 minutes for such time at one of the plenaries, allowing for a 5 minute presentation and 5 minute discussion? NANOG has been doing something like this- the Lightning presos. You could even imagine someone carrying over a topic from this IETF discussion list or the previous meeting. This gives people an opportunity to collect their thoughts, perhaps even post a draft, and then give a quick summary of it.
Some would say that the moment may have passed, and that decisions will be taken. But 2 minutes is more than enough time for someone to say "-1" or "+1", or to make a very brief point as to why someone should be "-1" or "+1".
Eliot
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.