![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On 2009-11-18 11:15, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > So I'd find it really useful to know what problem this dispute > resolution mechanism is actually supposed to solve. Since we're (presumably) trying to write rules that will work when common sense has failed, it seems prudent to have a clear path for disputes of an unknown nature. Brian
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.