RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules)

From: "Dan Wing" <dwing at cisco.com>
To: "'Stephan Wenger'" <stewe at stewe.org>, "'Scott Lawrence'" <scott.lawrence at nortel.com>, "'IETF-Discussion list'" <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:32:15 -0800
In-reply-to: <C72AD3A4.1DD6C%stewe at stewe.org>
References: <1258630815.6382.186.camel at scott> <C72AD3A4.1DD6C%stewe at stewe.org>

> Rescinding RFCs-to-be only based on late disclosures may set 
> a precedence for the future we may not like.

Doing so would provide an incentive for the patent holder to delay disclosure
until after the RFC is issued.

IETF lacks a censure policy for such violations.  Maybe we need one.

-d

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules)
  - From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu

References:
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  - From: Scott Lawrence
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
  - From: Stephan Wenger

Prev by Date: Please comment on IAOC candidates be appointed by the IESG
Next by Date: Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
Previous by thread: Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
Next by thread: Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.