Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>]

Thomas,

> I don't necessarily have an opinion about the proposed changes, but I
> don't quite understand the rationale.
>
> "Specification Required" is intended to allow for publication of
> documents outside of RFCs. It reqiures an Expert Reviewer to look at
> the document and make a determination about whether the spec is
> sufficiently implementable.

I do not understand this either, but I'll note that draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp 
has a ton of Standards Action IANA rules. It does not make sense to have 
such rules in a spec that itself is going for Experimental. So maybe 
Magnus should have said s/Specification Required/Standards Action/ in 
his e-mail... I would support the change of Standards Action rules to 
IETF Review.

Jari