RE: Fwd: [OPS-DIR] OPS-DIR Review of draft-yevstifeyev-tn3270-uri-12

> > The reviewer furthermore states, following the rules in
> > RFC4395 the document should provide concrete contact information for
the
> > editor instead of an anonymous email address only.
> That would be corrected so that the author will be IETF and contact -
IESG.

I am not really sure whether this is appropriate.

Why are you keen of keeping it more or less anonymous?

Cheers,
Mehmet

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Mykyta Yevstifeyev [mailto:evnikita2@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 1:58 AM
> To: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich); IETF Discussion
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [OPS-DIR] OPS-DIR Review of
draft-yevstifeyev-tn3270-
> uri-12
> 
> 12.01.2011 14:19, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ops-dir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ops-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of ext Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 1:07 PM
> > To: ops-dir@ietf.org
> > Cc: draft-yevstifeyev-tn3270-uri-authors@tools.ietf.org
> > Subject: [OPS-DIR] OPS-DIR Review of draft-yevstifeyev-tn3270-uri-12
> >
> > I reviewed draft-yevstifeyev-tn3270-uri-12 for its operational
> impacts..
> >
> > Summary:
> > The document gives a specification of syntax, semantics and use of
> > 'tn3270' URI scheme.
> >
> > Obviously this is an individual submission without any document
> write-up
> > and supporting AD.
> Why without?  Peter Saint-Andre is sponsoring AD.
> > I would like to read a document write-up with the regular template
> even
> > if it is written by the author.
> >
> > The main purpose of the document, namely to update the IANA
> registration
> > of tn3270 URI scheme using the given registration template, should
be
> > added to the Introduction section. In general I would suggest to
> include
> > in the Introduction section the purpose of the action and more
> > importantly why existing IANA registrations are not sufficient and
> why
> > the publication of this RFC is needed.
> Agreed.  I'll add that as soon as possible.
> > Obviously the GEN-Area reviewer (Tom Petch) has an opposite opinion
> and
> > does not see this IANA registration in the interest of IETF (see
> >
>
https://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=933&k2=55119&tid=12
> 9
> > 4831574). The reviewer furthermore states, following the rules in
> > RFC4395 the document should provide concrete contact information for
> the
> > editor instead of an anonymous email address only.
> That would be corrected so that the author will be IETF and contact -
> IESG.
> > I don't see any additional operation impact other than above.
> >
> > Other issues:
> >
> > - The used language needs some polishing.
> >
> > - Following are draft nits suggesting correction:
> >
> > == The copyright year in the IETF Trust and authors Copyright Line
> does
> > not
> >     match the current year
> >
> > ->  Use new template or: s/2010/2011/
> Will be corrected.
> > -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 1738
> >     (Obsoleted by RFC 4248, RFC 4266)
> >
> > ->  Use correct reference or clarify.
> Obsolete Informational references are allowed.  I don't see a problem
> here.
> 
> Mykyta
> >
> > Mehmet
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OPS-DIR mailing list
> > OPS-DIR@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-dir
> >