IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RFC 3777 Update for Vacancies]

"Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu> Wed, 24 October 2012 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF2421F8A6B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OmMjV9Svle99 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ackroyd.harvard.edu (ackroyd.harvard.edu [128.103.208.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E5B21F8A49 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exchange.university.harvard.edu (entwedge0000000.university.harvard.edu [10.35.2.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ackroyd.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A7AE8CB5; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:25:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ENTWHUBT0000005.university.harvard.edu (10.32.208.51) by ENTWEDGE0000000.university.harvard.edu (10.35.2.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:24:36 -0400
Received: from ENTWEXMB0000008.university.harvard.edu ([169.254.1.87]) by ENTWHUBT0000005.university.harvard.edu ([10.32.208.51]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:25:04 -0400
From: "Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3777 Update for Vacancies]
Thread-Topic: [RFC 3777 Update for Vacancies]
Thread-Index: AQHNsgKf7I9KSYfz7UyfmlaB/6ys/JfJKYQAgAAA0QA=
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:25:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CF2C098E-9928-4951-8EE8-154D8D894BC0@harvard.edu>
References: <D90D92A7-0906-4620-93A0-D116D15A10FA@gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCE_ocLmv1Q4DtGn8GYHRs1byatrXpTjHLX5wueg=jx_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCE_ocLmv1Q4DtGn8GYHRs1byatrXpTjHLX5wueg=jx_g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [136.248.127.173]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <D4CC2C6D60520D4F81F637E640485162@Exchange.university.harvard.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:25:27 -0000

On Oct 24, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
 wrote:

> 
> 2:
>    For vacancies due to uncontested, sustained absence, the IETF body
>    making that determination will issue an Extended Last Call to the
>    community.
> 
> Where is "Extended Last Call" defined?  There should be a citation thither, or a definition here.

RFC 2026 section 9.1

   The proposed variance must detail the problem perceived, explain the
   precise provision of this document which is causing the need for a
   variance, and the results of the IESG's considerations including
   consideration of points (a) through (d) in the previous paragraph.
   The proposed variance shall be issued as an Internet Draft.  The IESG
   shall then issue an extended Last-Call, of no less than 4 weeks, to
   allow for community comment upon the proposal.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email