A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster

Sabahattin Gucukoglu <listsebby@me.com> Sat, 24 November 2012 01:46 UTC

Return-Path: <listsebby@me.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA5521F862D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:46:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tf9PGsLPNtJ2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:46:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nk11p04mm-asmtp008.mac.com (nk11p04mm-asmtp008.mac.com [17.158.236.243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806CE21F8613 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:46:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (natbox.sabahattin-gucukoglu.com [213.123.192.30]) by nk11p04mm-asmtp008.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Jan 3 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0MDY00LU3Y9LGM20@nk11p04mm-asmtp008.mac.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 01:46:35 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8185, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-11-23_16:2012-11-23, 2012-11-23, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=15 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001 definitions=main-1211230340
From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu <listsebby@me.com>
Subject: A Splendid Example Of A Renumbering Disaster
Message-id: <54E43A43-A9F3-4803-BAB9-B06F4EB0CB19@me.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 01:46:32 +0000
To: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 01:46:35 -0000

It's Friday.  Time to plug IPv6 some more. :-)

http://b.logme.in/2012/11/07/changes-to-hamachi-on-november-19th/

LogMeIn Hamachi is basically a NAT-traversing layer 2 VPN solution.  They avoided conflicts with RFC 1918 space by hijacking IPv4 space in 5/8, now actively being allocated by LIRs in Europe.  When that didn't work (see link above), they moved to 25/8, allocated to the UK MoD.  While I'm almost sure that they haven't got it quite so wrong this time, following the comments says that the idea was not only a very bad one to start with, it's cost a lot of people a lot of grief that IPv6 was clearly going to mitigate in renumbering.  Perhaps it is why they recommend it per default, if not for the number of applications that would be broken by it.

By the way, is this an application that the new shared transition space might benefit?

Cheers,
Sabahattin