IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC

t.p. <daedulus@btconnect.com> Fri, 25 January 2013 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE91C21F889C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:06:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MdoQL9y2eJEe for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:06:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co9ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [207.46.163.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3728321F8795 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:06:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail88-co9-R.bigfish.com (10.236.132.245) by CO9EHSOBE025.bigfish.com (10.236.130.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:06:32 +0000
Received: from mail88-co9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail88-co9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E43F2A02F9; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:06:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.253.85; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:DB3PRD0710HT002.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -21
X-BigFish: PS-21(zzbb2dI98dI9371I542I1432Izz1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h5a9h668h839h93fhd24hf0ah1177h1179h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah139eh13b6h1441h1504h1537h162dh1631h1758h17f1h184fh1898h18e1h304l1155h)
Received: from mail88-co9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail88-co9 (MessageSwitch) id 1359137190463597_13345; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:06:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO9EHSMHS032.bigfish.com (unknown [10.236.132.234]) by mail88-co9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5033C00A0; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:06:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3PRD0710HT002.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.253.85) by CO9EHSMHS032.bigfish.com (10.236.130.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:06:29 +0000
Received: from DB3PRD0210HT005.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (157.56.253.69) by pod51017.outlook.com (10.255.75.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.257.4; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:06:27 +0000
Message-ID: <00e001cdfb26$50e31200$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
References: <017001cdf017$c394df00$4abe9d00$@olddog.co.uk><50FEC0B8.8060905@isi.edu><201301222131.r0MLVK8C015116@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com><51028A77.2060808@cisco.com><E2AC36AC55ED79756BE8929E@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <5102A53A.8070206@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:59:16 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.253.69]
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, adrian@olddog.co.uk, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:06:33 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eliot Lear" <lear@cisco.com>
To: "John C Klensin" <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: "Thomas Narten" <narten@us.ibm.com>; <adrian@olddog.co.uk>;
<ietf@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 3:31 PM
> John,
>
> On 1/25/13 4:27 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> >>> a WG can
> >>> skip WG LC if they think its not needed.
> >> ???
> >>
> >> When was the last time that happened?  Did it require a
> >> consensus call to determine?
> > Chair discretion [... and five of paragraphs of text]
>
> None of which answered my above questions.  When was the last time
> chairs USED that discretion?!

I believe that it was used for
draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
in December 2009.

Tom Petch


>
> Eliot
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email