Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections
"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Mon, 25 March 2013 02:23 UTC
Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC6F21F8C49 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 19:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.092, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WyrTnleneeEM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 19:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailc2.tigertech.net (mailc2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.156]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8023021F8BCF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 19:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566F7240042; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 19:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c2.tigertech.net
Received: from [10.10.10.104] (pool-70-106-135-233.clppva.east.verizon.net [70.106.135.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A577240044; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 19:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <514FB516.6050702@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 22:23:18 -0400
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections
References: <20130320104353.27601.24590.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <76F7932F-CABE-4825-80DB-461E95288402@jiaziyi.com> <CADnDZ89mBrJAHQOHegSXFacC_DHSn5R34BpMtbkQ1qjOF+vZYA@mail.gmail.com> <1227E12F-9593-4A8C-A54D-B210A61060D2@jiaziyi.com> <CADnDZ8-NN0pWh5WuoJg3Jmgw_MtLpw51mrhiW2=P8i8hXJoL0g@mail.gmail.com> <5E51EF77-3D8E-4D22-A753-329CEB53CD59@istaff.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20130324123511.0abd0878@resistor.net> <CADnDZ893B70g3i0rTTiy6JMH26SVkwyZwGS9vhY8DqEn0CU8NA@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ88Gs1VvvpEsEoPyMLyHV1JeTWVXtsfs4NgYrncCdvjZ7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ88Gs1VvvpEsEoPyMLyHV1JeTWVXtsfs4NgYrncCdvjZ7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 02:23:32 -0000
I think I at least partly disagree. The acknowledgements section of RFCs was not, and to the best of my knowledge is not, concerned with capturing the history of where specific changes or ideas came from. It ought to be concerned with giving credit to folks who made particularly large, but not authorship level, contributions to the document. I have seen I-Ds which included change logs which made an effort to capture the major changes to a document and their cause. these were, at best, ungainly. And are, as far as I know, always removed before publicaiton as an RFC. Yours, Joel On 3/24/2013 8:55 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote: > Just to make things clear that the intention of documents > acknowledging is to reflect the truth of any document process and > connect information or resources. IMHO, it is not the purpose to show > credit to any person including authors, it is to show how changes were > developed and show true document-history. > > So when I read a RFC I may go through the document process and its > draft versions, while going through the drafts related I see > acknowledged names so I may find the input on the list for such name. > In this way we have connections between inputs otherwise the IETF > system has no connection between its important information. > > AB >
- "Acknowledgements" vs new Contributions section. Hector Santos
- Re: [manet] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Jiazi Yi
- Re: [manet] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Abdussalam Baryun
- On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sectio… John Curran
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… David Morris
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… SM
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Melinda Shore
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Melinda Shore
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Paul Hoffman
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Glen Zorn
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Fernando Gont
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Melinda Shore
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… John Curran
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Abdussalam Baryun
- RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… l.wood
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Melinda Shore
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Loa Andersson
- It's a personal statement (Re: On the tradition o… Carsten Bormann
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… SM
- Re: [manet] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Jiazi Yi
- Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the traditi… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Arturo Servin
- Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the traditi… Paul Hoffman
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… John C Klensin
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Dave Crocker
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… John C Klensin
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Scott Kitterman
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Dave Crocker
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Scott Brim
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Melinda Shore
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Joe Abley
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Elwyn Davies
- Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the traditi… Hector Santos
- Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the traditi… Carsten Bormann
- Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the traditi… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… John C Klensin
- Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the traditi… Dave Crocker
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Sam Hartman
- Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the traditi… Sam Hartman
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Hector Santos
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… t.p.
- RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… l.wood
- Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the traditi… Donald Eastlake
- RE: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… l.wood
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… joel jaeggli
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Ulrich Herberg
- RE: It's a personal statement (Re: On the traditi… l.wood
- Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On the traditi… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [IETF] Re: It's a personal statement (Re: On … Warren Kumari
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" se… Keith Moore