IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: More participation from under-represented regions

Juliao Braga <juliao@braga.eti.br> Mon, 27 May 2013 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <juliao@braga.eti.br>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4FF21F9446 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id srsDqChfJoeT for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-x235.google.com (mail-yh0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C92921F9377 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f53.google.com with SMTP id f64so577853yha.12 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=1FnfmbLNeh8yKIUDc6kdVQfWPxmSReG7KYQGtrkpmEA=; b=O+P2mw/FZyLYx5eKrY3GoHVjlD983ngXJnRYsHv1UpBV35DeBiN6VwKrkGYZpOrCGz UIrOY8SKTMzFLzgcmE2qX7ov+WnmTwdnhED7uyS2pKzmcK+cpLOyJt6BHN8QRSUQ//hT 0Bk6etucB0Pr3mh24h7EMjInhFVSSH2jiJJ+kY/LDbLdLXRIkh9+KZlZvBbWNXLIgK9U 5zdmZt7kCHJ++8kfL8MVA0kYQYqPWXsBMJoqL8jFTVvfjQRtZPyb7p4dOvZjrjSFlH24 I7DA9tVGzwoTizyZYRG3fnL65Yj2weBQ9Ktcvc2ZzAwi65qv6jaQZ/+7jZWKnfv08cP5 V5ug==
X-Received: by 10.236.139.75 with SMTP id b51mr13792208yhj.6.1369612956607; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:1294:1295:1295::167? ([2001:1294:1295:1295::167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v34sm37301440yhn.26.2013.05.26.17.02.33 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 26 May 2013 17:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51A2A296.1010305@braga.eti.br>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 21:02:30 -0300
From: Juliao Braga <juliao@braga.eti.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: More participation from under-represented regions
References: <20130523155412.29158.24895.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <737D9439-A200-47C3-BE8B-6E6074CBD1F5@gmail.com> <51A23B7F.3050702@dcrocker.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20130526122352.0bc6e588@resistor.net> <51A273FF.6060109@gmail.com> <CANeGSFm7QFHDwF9Rxpf9LQb=sLyaO6viz47jrPrHEjpWHWO0ow@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130526154034.0c284960@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130526154034.0c284960@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlmyy3bYKlHHLE98UBpaMVxRAEXzEyZIQxfr+Avp8Oe72OpfigefTo402gCDuegsw3Cmub9
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 00:02:38 -0000

SM, FYI:

Inscriptions at IETF 86 [1]:

ARIN	 RIPE	  APNIC	   AFRINIC	LACNIC
 671	  258	   237	      31	   26
  54.87%   21.10%   19.38%     2.53%	    2.13%

Inscriptions since IETF 72 to IETF 85. For Year, RIR and Country:
http://rfc.pegasus.com.br/ietf.php

I think the local of the meeting no change the numbers. For me the
apparent common sense prevails in the list and Dave Crocker pointed
(...let's attack that...): the issue is to establish a systematic and
effective process in under-represented regions (countries, I think).

Regards,

Julião
1. http://rfc.pegasus.com.br/ietf86.php (including, year, RIR and Country)


Em 26/05/2013 20:01, SM escreveu:
> AfNOG has trained hundreds of people in Africa.  Those people do not
> participate on the mailing list.  There are some people from Africa who
> have attended IETF meetings.  They don't participate in the IETF.  Why
> is it that there are some participants from South America whereas there
> aren't any participants from Africa?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email