Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Mon, 21 October 2013 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1988C21F9D56 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BgE-eDuWffqh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0225F21F9D28 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c11so4949034lbj.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=W5hIA7dySTQBrKmOsRF+J/wjsWrfDpKj+3qlDr6+GGI=; b=gray2qjz85criukMOLqw0ZdqFT/XNOS1e/ANgZ8z9x2J/XNrRTjdBSKs2SxJg+k/mS HOdU/rgZYEzyMEn8S4c6tBUggP9pIcMqJoF+7oPu7hdPxgySOeHIbx2+uuqafA1n80oS 5wLvHFtD+xBzX5HLY3dN0FvHgdB7FHAyVbInXCZFOOqkLuaJS/zvuhP6CoOjG4G2eGOd 3EQBjdBFOPCPiNr2THJgbZAYfpLdt+TX1anYE0eA17Ertq1wlK/Lk4K1rAM3T2rGESGJ Ppmp7Ne125YcG9cLgBBjSIFEQ/VC9qtLOvNLzK9BZ6XmWUFg78J3PsSakXE7l+rolKw1 mWtw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.29.103 with SMTP id j7mr14023653lah.7.1382373431765; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.148.165 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51234A08-1462-46DA-A179-A0823DFDD90C@hopcount.ca>
References: <20131021125834.GA24167@nic.fr> <CAMm+LwhngSCp3BoBpVu3u09pmFAcYx0KqUrt7g5eP=5TmG2yYQ@mail.gmail.com> <51234A08-1462-46DA-A179-A0823DFDD90C@hopcount.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:37:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwjY4=_+yHNrUSXzxNJpz_=4s5kW5DxGR-PB91pU5cADNg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0160b82858f1db04e942e51f"
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:39:29 -0000

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:

>
> On 2013-10-21, at 11:14, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think it is counter productive to label opinions you find unpleasant
> 'troll'. That implies that the only reason the views are raised is to
> provoke a pointless argument.
>
> I don't think Stephane was labelling an opinion a troll. I think he was
> labelling the source of the opinions a troll.


That is the same thing.

It is rude.

It is bullying.

It should stop.


-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/