IETF Logo Mail Archive

Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Thu, 28 November 2013 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075F91ADBD2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:17:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X8MU5Q8sIclD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:17:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg20.ericsson.net (sesbmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFE01AC421 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:17:48 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb38-b7f2c8e000006d25-b6-52970a3b2b85
Received: from ESESSHC019.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sesbmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 9E.58.27941.B3A07925; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:17:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [131.160.36.172] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:17:42 +0100
Message-ID: <52970A36.5010503@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:17:42 +0200
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrBJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra411/Qgg7dPZSyebZzPYjFn1wMm ByaPJUt+Mnl8ufyZLYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvjzTzVgovMFQt37WJuYPzJ1MXIySEhYCKx Z9NfVghbTOLCvfVsXYxcHEICRxglulafYYVw1jBKHJlxEKyKV0BbovnGWmYQm0VAVWLngeVg NpuAhcSWW/dZQGxRgSiJ8+deMkHUC0qcnPkELC4ioCzxaOp5NhCbWUBJYvGvN2AzhQX0JS7O XQUU5wC6QlyipzEIokRPYsrVFkYIW15i+9s5YKuEgE5Y/qyFZQKjwCwkG2YhaZmFpGUBI/Mq Ro7i1OKk3HQjg02MwNA7uOW3xQ7Gy39tDjFKc7AoifN+fOscJCSQnliSmp2aWpBaFF9UmpNa fIiRiYNTqoHR1qvruJPQ7dx8Y369XUHFRRYtKXeetl6p+Wn9X3B+efWiBVIWHDV/oguyzVe1 p/oVli1/kfu//uP1MHHpmIOGIoaftupEVVS+Nl3zQulvWeUDZ//MIMUFtTPtrnYrLbTt+hfu MuvQxo4Le46eDlv+SCJw1oxP9nLbFqeuKX+9wNzO6MQekwlKLMUZiYZazEXFiQBWrvXtCwIA AA==
Cc: rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:17:51 -0000

Folks,

as you may know, the RTCWeb WG is trying to select a
mandatory-to-implement video codec. So far, the WG has been unable to
reach consensus using traditional consensus calls. Now, the WG is
considering alternative options to make that decision.

If you are interested in following that discussion on the RTCWeb list,
this would be a good place to start:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg09909.html

Cheers,

Gonzalo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email