IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Suggested changes to draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-04

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sun, 15 December 2013 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC0C1AE1C0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:55:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x4QfrZDyW23E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:55:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41501A1F6F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:55:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBFKtAFZ014699 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:55:13 -0800
Message-ID: <52AE16E8.1040201@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:54:00 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Suggested changes to draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-04
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20131215122911.0cc5af60@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20131215122911.0cc5af60@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:55:13 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:55:32 -0000

On 12/15/2013 12:38 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There was a discussion with the (sponsoring) Area Director and document
> shepherd about the Introduction section of
> draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-04 [1].  The following change is
> suggested:
>
>      The work of the IETF relies on cooperation among a diverse range of
>      people, ideas, and communication styles.  The IETF strives, through
>      the guidelines for conduct, to create and maintain an environment
>      in which every person is treated with dignity, decency, and respect.
>      People who participate in the IETF are expected to behave in a
>      professional manner as we work together to develop interoperable
>      technologies for the Internet.  All IETF participants aim to abide by
>      these guidelines as we build consensus in person and through email
>      discussions.  If conflicts arise they are resolved according to the
>      procedures outlined in RFC 2026 [RFC2026].

Nice.

Small suggestion is to add (rough), so that a casual reader won't miss 
that our version of consensus does not mean unanimity.

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email